It was designed for ease of management - it doesn’t require sync groups, needs fewer overall management tasks, and enables admins to monitor, manage, and automate all sync jobs in real-time from a single dashboard. Resilio Connect uses P2P file replication and a proprietary WAN optimization transfer protocol to optimize file transfer and provide scalable, high-performance synchronization in any environment. To see if Resilio Connect could be a good fit for you, schedule a demo or learn more here. Organizations in media (Turner Sports, Warner Brothers), gaming (2K Games, Blizzard), tech (, Cisco), retail (McDonald’s, Mercedes-Benz), and more use Resilio Connect to automate sync jobs and enhance business workflows. It can be managed using a centralized Management Console, handle large replication jobs with ease (no limits on file size, and can easily sync large numbers of files and syncs quickly to many endpoints), and flexibly deployed on a variety of servers and/or any cloud storage platform. Resilio Connect is an agent-based replication solution that uses a P2P (peer-to-peer) transfer topology and WAN optimization to deliver fast replication (performance of 10+ Gbps per server) that always “just works” over any network (no matter how unreliable). In this article, we’ll discuss several sync solutions that can be used as an alternative to or in conjunction with AFS - starting with a deep dive into our own file sync solution, Resilio Connect. AFS only syncs changes once every 24 hours in the Azure Cloud. There should be options to control this - via schedule, on-demand, or real-time sync. ![]() Poor efficiency: When a file is synchronized, only the changed portion of the file should be synchronized - and it should be synced efficiently across as many endpoints as needed without extra overhead.Not only does it require more management endpoints, but, with its point-to-point transfer architecture, AFS has trouble syncing large deployments in a timely manner. Poor scalability: AFS doesn’t handle sync for large deployments well.But as your sync environment grows - i.e., syncing large files, syncing more files, syncing to many endpoints - managing sync becomes more complex (i.e., requires more management endpoints). Complexity of file sync management: Managing synchronization with AFS is easy for simple, homogenous sync environments.Transferring files point-to-point creates a bottleneck effect if one point fails, the whole sync job grinds to a halt. Slow sync topology: Like most file sync solutions, AFS uses a point-to-point file transfer topology.Businesses that are already using other storage solutions will have to migrate or use a more flexible sync solution that can be deployed on the storage they’re using. ![]() And for cloud storage, it’s limited to Azure file storage. Lack of flexibility: AFS can only be deployed on Windows, Linux, and macOS servers. ![]() Azure only: AFS is not multicloud, meaning you can’t use it with other cloud solutions.And while it works well for small-scale sync jobs, organizations with larger, more complex replication and sync requirements that need to sync at scale may want to consider an Azure File Sync (AFS) alternative (or complementary solution that can fill in the gaps).Īnother big reason to consider an alternative to AFS is the need for multiple cloud solutions (AFS only works with Azure) and/or to maximize utilization of your existing IT environment (servers, storage, networks, etc.). Microsoft Azure File Sync is a software-only solution for replicating and syncing Windows file servers with Azure Files.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |